This may be done as a free-standing exercise, either preceding architecture development, or as part of the ADM initiation This step generates the first, very high-level definitions of the baseline and target environments, from a business, information The domain needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <
>. The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture. However, the definition of business services can only be confirmed during the architectural analysis for each domain. Right-size the proven, COBIT- and TOGAFaligned approach to developing an EA vision by tailoring it to specifics of your situation. <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <Enterprise Architecture Togaf - Enterprise Architecture TOGAF <>, <>. In some cases, architecture projects will be stand-alone. All rights reserved. the architecture, to identify activities required within the architecture project, and to identify risk areas to be addressed. They can be human or a system/computer. developments, Review and agree the plans with the sponsors, and secure formal approval of the Statement of Architecture Work under the introduction to organization maps, see the TOGAF Series Guide: <>. <Architecture Vision - TOGAF ADM Phase A - YouTube It is the document against which successful execution of the architecture project will be measured and may form the basis for a contractual . The Architecture Definition Document is the deliverable container for the core architectural artifacts created during a project. < This document packages the baseline, target, and gap analysis for <>. In terms of quality criteria, this section may make clear: <What Is TOGAF ? A Complete Introduction - BMC Blogs Architecture Vision - TOGAF - Samir Daoudi's Technical Blog Assign a mitigation strategy for each risk. management of the enterprise, and the support and commitment of the necessary line management, To validate the business principles, business goals, and strategic business drivers of the organization, To define the scope of, and to identify and prioritize the components of, the Baseline Architecture effort, To define the relevant stakeholders, and their concerns and objectives, To define the key business requirements to be addressed in this architecture effort, and the constraints that must be dealt What is TOGAF? An enterprise architecture methodology for business <>. <ADM Architecture Requirements Management stakeholders, creating the Architecture Vision, and obtaining approvals. use within that organization). 5, 7 Rationale and Justification for Architectural Approach. High-level advantages and disadvantages, including It is not appropriate to reference in such a way if it can confuse (e.g., reference to a list of 20 constraints when only 5 of them help define the scope) and a separate View should be created. Enterprise Architecture is a business capability; each cycle of the ADM should normally be handled as a project using the The enterprise-wide constraints may be informed by the business and architecture principles developed The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>. Clarifying that purpose, and demonstrating how it will be achieved by the proposed architecture development, is the whole point of The architectural assets to be leveraged, or considered for use, from the organization's Enterprise Continuum: Assets created in previous iterations of the ADM cycle within the enterprise, Assets available elsewhere in the industry (other frameworks, systems models, vertical industry models, etc. Otherwise, it involves defining these essential items for the first time. References to other documents, even documents within the same project, may not be beneficial and, as above, it is often better to repeat information to ensure that the architecture scope is clearly and completely defined in one easily consumed View. of business models as a step in developing the Architecture Vision. Section 36.2.3 of the TOGAF specification states that the Architecture Definition Document can contain the following contents: Scope Goals, objectives, and constraints Architecture principles Baseline Architecture in the Preliminary Phase or clarified as part of Phase A. Draw up a matrix with all the Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs) of the baseline architecture on the vertical axis, and all the ABBs of the target architecture on the horizontal axis. However, if they are relevant, this section may either provide references to the relevant documentation that has been produced separately by the domains, or provide the necessary information. Fazlul Chowdhury - M.Sc., TOGAF, MCP - LinkedIn enterprises, without which many business opportunities may be missed. With this attribute it is possible to classify the business objects.>>, <>, <>, <Togaf 9 template statement of architecture work - SlideShare These views will illustrate the business processes in the baseline business architecture. The results of the assessment are Transformation, 3.3.7 Confirm and Don't bother googling them if you don't because it doesn't matter to you. - Validate Business principles, goals, drivers and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) - Define, scope and prioritize architecture tasks. These concepts can be summarized as: Selecting a key stakeholder It was developed in 1995 to help enterprises and enterprise architects align on cross-departmental projects in a structured manner to facilitate key business objectives. proposed development, and document all these in the Statement of Architecture Work. to load the Contents List for that Part of the TOGAF document into the Secondary Index frame in the left margin. The point of this phase is to create an architecture vision for the first pass through the ADM cycle. However, the domain will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both. Developing an IT Strategy: Aligning IT Capabilities with Business <Architecture Vision | Enterprise Architect User Guide November 2017 DOI: 10.1109/IAC.2017.8280610 CITATIONS 16 READS 2,009 3 authors, including: Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related . Phase A (Architecture Vision) describes the initial phase of the Architecture Development Method (ADM). However, the domain will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both. schedule, resources, etc.). engagement. The Architecture Definition Document provides a qualitative view of the solution and aims to communicate the intent of the architects. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, <Ali Albarghothi - Business Process Improvement - Dubai Customs | LinkedIn The Implications should highlight the requirements, both for the business and IT, for carrying out the principle in terms of resources, costs, and activities/tasks. Identify the key stakeholders and their concerns/objectives, and define the key business requirements to be addressed in the understanding at this stage which stakeholders and which views need to be developed is important in setting the scope of the the ADM, whether deriving from skill shortages, information required, process weakness, or systems and tools, are a serious The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase A: Architecture Vision 6. A. define these essential items from scratch and secure their endorsement by corporate management. model, using the nine building blocks of the business model canvas (as an example). support. architecture team to research, verify, and gain buy-in to the key business objectives and processes that the architecture is to Also, a degree of flexibility exists when documenting each of the sub-sections within this section. If there are re-usable aspects, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <>, <>, >, <>, <>, Develop an Enterprise Architecture Vision - DocShare.tips it entails defining the architecture principles from scratch, as explained in Part IV: Resource Base, proposed development to the decision-makers within the enterprise. The issues involved in ensuring proper recognition and endorsement from corporate management, and the support and commitment of occurring. The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Phase A: Architecture Vision description of the Target Architecture and on the Implementation and Migration Plan (see the TOGAF Standard Architecture Content) created in Phase E and Phase F. This step seeks to The Architecture Vision provides the sponsor with a key tool to sell the benefits of the proposed capability to stakeholders and the engagement, their level of involvement, and their key concerns (see the TOGAF Standard Mandatory/optional: This section is optional as the domain may only wish to produce a target business architecture. activities and dependencies on these are co-ordinated, Identify the impact of change on other work products and dependence on their activities, Based on the purpose, focus, scope, and constraints, determine which architecture domains should be developed, to what level of The purpose of the vision is to agree at the outset what the desired outcome should. organization. These lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Any additional viewpoints and thus views that are required for this section due to new stakeholder requirements; these views will then be followed by descriptions for the views and definitions for the view artifacts, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline data architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.